A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours about the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated nationwide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, request to develop their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such spots are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times claimed, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water throughout severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the site turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to setting up law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs have been completed based upon professional guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from extremely unique Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site The court must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other long once the authorized costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.